Evaluation of Impact on Public Transportation Headwinds: The Case of eThekwini Municipality Department of Transport

Authors

  • Charles Tony Simphiwe Ngwenya Graduate School of Business & Leadership, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
  • Nkosinathi Dube College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v5i3.1827

Keywords:

Optimal Public Transport, Public Transportation Access, Risks, Resources

Abstract

The challenges and constraints confronting public transportation efficiency within the regulatory local government stewardship in the municipality’s spheres continue to have an inventory of misdemeanours such as mismanagement, dilapidating built environment in infrastructure, subdued digitalisation integration and transformation, contestation from privately owned transport entities, and poor control over transport operations. The public transport operations and its associated assets or infrastructure provide accessibility and act as wheels of economic growth and prosperity. These deliver a critical component of the envisaged good quality of life and standard of living from both the business perspectives and citizenry livelihoods state of affairs. The study investigated the public transport ecosystem and risks with associated resources. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from pertinent stakeholders’ respondents to predict and explain insights and trends from both primary and secondary stakeholders within the public transport fraternity in the city. The positivist philosophical approach of the quantitative methodology, with its deductive paradigmatic stance, is selected in the study. The main findings indicate the lack of comprehensive consultation and buy-in within the broader stakeholder involvement. The findings further signified a gap in risk mitigation and resource optimisation and the significance of public service accessibility as a priority for policy-makers and practitioners. Findings indicate that the Transport Division realised the need to inculcate pragmatic execution in investing resources and capabilities from a problem-solving and decision-making perspective. This could yield sustained public service deliverables in desirable and sustainable dimensions within the complex public transportation sector.

References

Acheampong, R. A., Asabere, S. B., & Asuah, A. Y. (2022). Urban form and access to public transport in Accra, Ghana. In Transport and mobility futures in Urban Africa (pp. 17-31). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Annamalah, S., Raman, M., Marthandan, G., & Logeswaran, A. K. (2018). Implementation of enterprise risk management (ERM) framework in enhancing business performances in oil and gas sector. Economies, 6(1), 4.

Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European journal of operational research, 253(1), 1–3.

Backman, C. A., Verbeke, A., & Schulz, R. A. (2017). The drivers of corporate climate change strategies and public policy: A new resource-based view. Perspective. Business & Society, 56(4), 545-575.

Balaban, S., Zhang, H. & Eilouti, B. (2021). Quantitative data collection in healthcare research. Public Health Reports, 136(1), 96–105.

Berry‐Stölzle, T. R., & Xu, J. (2018). Enterprise risk management and the cost of capital. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 85(1), 159-201.

Chen, M.S. and Li, S.L., 2021. Infection risk perception and transit usage during viral outbreaks. Transport Policy, 103(1). 286–294.

Crawford, J.T. & Kelder, J.A. (2023). Quantitative techniques in the digital age. Software X, 19.

Friman, M., Lättman, K., & Olsson, L. E. (2020). Public transport quality, safety, and perceived accessibility. Sustainability, 12(9), 3563.

Govender, K. K. (2016). Exploring public transport service quality: the case of mini-bus taxi service in South Africa. Eurasian Business Review, 6, 101-116.

Hassel, H., & Cedergren, A. (2021). Integrating risk assessment and business impact assessment in the public crisis management sector. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56, 102136.

Heinonen, K., & Strandvik, T. (2021). Reframing service innovation: COVID-19 as a catalyst for imposed service innovation. Journal of Service Management, 32(1), 101-112.

Hejazi, M.T. (2021). ‘Effect of supply chain resilience on organisational performance through knowledge sharing’, Revistage Innovative Technologies 11(4), 4764–4771.

Jirsák, P. & Kršnáková, L. (2015). ‘Supply chain design–where to allocate logistics facility’. Perner’s Contacts, 10(4), 41–54.

Kelling, I., de Carvalho, S.G. and Teixeira, J.P. (2022). Public transport services in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: A snapshot. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(2), 497–509.

Khilji, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (2017). Talent management in the global context. The Oxford handbook of talent management, 399-420.

Levy, D. L., & Prakash, A. (2017). Bargains old and new: Multinational corporations in global governance. In International Environmental Governance (pp. 297-314). Routledge.

Lucas, K., Van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2016). Transportation, 43, 473-490.

Michener, C. D., & Sokal, R. R. (2017). A quantitative approach to a problem in classification. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 11(2), 130.

Mundie, J. (2020). Sustainable Mobility and Pandemic Recovery Plans. Presentation to 38th Southern Africa Transport Conference, July 9, 2021. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

Muzaimi, H., Chew, B. C., & Hamid, S. R. (2017). Integrated management system: The integration of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 and ISO 31000. In AIP conference proceedings, 1818 (1). AIP Publishing.

Nguyen, C.T., Pham, N.H., and Nguyen, D.T. (2020). Stratified random sampling method. Mathematical Theory and Modelling, 10(3), 32-39.

North, M.W. & Giddens, J.F. (2022). Quantitative research methods in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 43(1), 52–54.

Patel, S.R. and Gadhavi, B. (2021). Experimental research design in operations management. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46(1), 2046-2049.

Polyzos, S. (2019). Regional development, 2nd Edition, Athens, Kritiki Publications [in Greek].

Polyzos, S., & Tsiotas, D. (2020). The contribution of transport infrastructures to the economic and regional development. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 15(1), 5-23.

Prajapati, H., Kant, R. & Shankar, R. (2019). ‘Prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics implementation to mitigate its barriers: A hybrid modified SWARA and WASPAS approach’, Journal of Cleaner Production 240(1), 1–15.

Reeves, L.A. (2019). ‘Supply chain managers’ reverse logistics strategies to control cost through risk mitigation’, PhD thesis, Walden University, Minneapolis. Online - Supply Chain Managers' Reverse Logistics Strategies to Control Cost Through Risk Mitigation. Retrieved 2 January 2025.

Roy, M. and Schwartz, B. (2019). Exploring factors influencing the gaps between environmental concern, intention and actual behaviour in the context of public transportation ridership. Transportation, 47, 511–530.

Saidi, K. (2020). Transport priorities for realizing mobility justice during pandemic recovery. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Transportation Research Forum “Navigating a New Reality”. Transportation Research Forum: Chicago, Illinois.

Saif, M.A., Zefreh, M.M. & Torok, A. (2019). ‘Public transport accessibility: A literature review’, Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering 47(1), 36–43.

Sax, J., & Andersen, T. J. (2019). Making risk management strategic: Integrating enterprise risk management with strategic planning. European Management Review, 16(3), 719-740.

Shad, M. K., & Lai, F. W. (2019). Enterprise risk management implementation and firm performance: evidence from the Malaysian oil and gas industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(9), 47-53.

Skorobogatova, O., & Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017). Transport infrastructure development performance. Procedia Engineering, 178, 319-329.

Somabutr, S., Pandian, S.G. & Roh, S. (2021). ‘Conceptualising a resilient supply chain paradigm in service industry’, in the 4th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business (ICCMB), pp. 53–57, January 30–February 01, 2021, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library Association for computing Machinery, New York, NY.

Statistics South Africa. Online: https://www.statssa.gov.za/. Accessed: 10 September 2024

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5.

Teoli, D., Sanvictores, T., & An, J. (2019). SWOT analysis.

Thomya, W., & Saenchaiyathon, K. (2015). The effects of organisational culture and enterprise risk management on organisational performance: A conceptual. International Business Management, 9(2), 158-163.

Torabi, S. A., Giahi, R., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2016). An enhanced risk assessment framework for business continuity management systems. Safety Science, 89, 201-218.

Wachira, J. (2022). Lasting legacies of pandemic transport disruptions across Least Developed Countries. Journal of Transport and Health, March 2022.

Williams Jr, R. I., Manley, S. C., Aaron, J. R., & Daniel, F. (2018). The relationship between a comprehensive strategic approach and small business performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive only), 28(2), 33-48.

Wu, Y. C., Goh, M., Yuan, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2017). Logistics management research collaboration in Asia. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(1), 206-223.

Yoe, C. (2016). Framework Primer on risk analysis: decision making under uncertainty.

Zimmerman, S., & Fang, K. (2015). Public transport service optimisation and system integration. China Transport Topics, 14.

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Ngwenya, C. T. S., & Dube, N. . (2025). Evaluation of Impact on Public Transportation Headwinds: The Case of eThekwini Municipality Department of Transport. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 5(3), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v5i3.1827