From Nascent Research Ideas to Emergent Grounded Theory – a Novice Researcher’s Reflections on the Grounded Theory Process

Helen Harrison

doi:10.47540/ijqr.v5i1.1949

Authors

Helen Harrison University of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v5i1.1949

Keywords:

Cross-Cultural Research, Grounded Theory, Novice Researcher

Abstract

The problem addressed in this paper relates to the challenges faced by a researcher re-engaging with the academic world after an absence of many years. My recent re-entry to this arena followed twenty-plus years of immersion in the international development sector and the exploration of academic opportunities as a new direction that could enhance my international work. My re-engagement in research included challenges that are perhaps slightly different from those who have followed the more conventional academic route. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on my journey of re-engagement with research at a doctoral level, in the hopes that it might bring insights that can be of use to other novice researchers as they journey on their academic path. The method used in my research was that of grounded theory in an overseas context, with open-structured interviews as the data collection tool, and women refugees as the research participants. The findings of this paper, therefore, reflect on pursuing a research study within that context as a novice researcher and draw out some relevant points of learning and reflection. The implications of these findings can be of particular use to readers who identify as novice Grounded Theory (GT) students, supervisors of novice GT researchers, or other qualitative researchers yet to determine their methodological route. There are also insights to be shared relating to carrying out overseas research and conducting research in a way that places the voices of the participants in the foreground.

References

Acosta Vicente, C. (2024). “You are a woman, so you understand what I mean.” Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 26(1), 114–143.

Aldiabat, K. M., & Le Navenec, C.-L. (2018). Data saturation: The mysterious step in grounded theory methodology. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 245–261.

Anyan, F. (2013). The Influence of Power Shifts in Data Collection and Analysis Stages: A Focus on Qualitative Research Interview. Qualitative Report, 18(18), 1–9.

Au, A. (2019). Thinking about cross-cultural differences in qualitative interviewing: Practices for more responsive and trusting encounters. Qualitative Report, 24(1), 58–77.

Bakker, J. I. (Hans). (2019). Grounded Theory Methodology and Grounded Theory Method: Introduction to the Special Issue. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 91–106.

Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: a practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage.

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory (A. Bryant & K. Charmaz, Eds.; 1st ed.). Sage.

Bukamal, H. (2022). Deconstructing insider–outsider researcher positionality. British Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 327–349.

Burr, V. (2015). Social Constructionism. Routledge.

Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327.

Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7.

Clarke, A., Healy, K., Lynch, D., & Featherstone, G. (2023). The Use of a Constructivist Grounded Theory Method - A Good Fit for Social Work Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22.

Corbin, J. (2017). Grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 301–302.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Routledge.

Gurung, L. (2020). Feminist Standpoint Theory: Conceptualization and Utility. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 14, 106–115.

Jenkins, K., Narayanaswamy, L., & Sweetman, C. (2019). Introduction: Feminist values in research. Gender & Development, 27(3), 415–425.

Kang, E., & Hwang, H.-J. (2021). Ethical conducts in qualitative research methodology: Participant observation and interview process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5–10.

Kearns, A. J. (2024). Principles and Nursing Ethics. In P. A. Scott & Shane. Scott (Eds.), Key Concepts and Issues in Nursing Ethics (2nd ed., pp. 107–116). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Keller, D. R. (2019). Realism or Relativism? In Ecology and Justice—Citizenship in Biotic Communities (Vol. 19, pp. 111–131). Springer, Cham.

Keyel, J. (2021). Encountering and processing secondary traumatic stress during qualitative interviews with displaced Iraqis: a research note. Qualitative Research, 21(2), 295–303.

Kim, G. (2023). Sociocultural contexts and power dynamics in research interviews: Methodological considerations in Confucian society. Qualitative Research, 23(6), 1556–1573.

Kimani, M., & Vanner, C. (2021). “When My Hands Were Tied, You Were Able to Continue.” Journal of Autoethnography, 2(2), 161–176.

Knott, E., Rao, A. H., Summers, K., & Teeger, C. (2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1), 73.

Lacey, L. (2013). Women for cows: An analysis of abductions of women in South Sudan. Agenda, 27(4), 91–108.

Low, J. (2019). A Pragmatic Definition of the Concept of Theoretical Saturation. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 131–139.

Mendola, D., & Pera, A. (2022). Vulnerability of refugees: Some reflections on definitions and measurement practices. International Migration, 60(5), 108–121.

Metelski, F. K., dos Santos, J. L. G., Cechinel-Peiter, C., Fabrizzio, G. C., Schmitt, M. D., & Heilemann, M. S. (2021). Constructivist Grounded Theory: characteristics and operational aspects for nursing research. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem, 55, 01–09.

Middleton, J., Harris, L. M., Matera Bassett, D., & Nicotera, N. (2022). “Your soul feels a little bruised”: Forensic interviewers’ experiences of vicarious trauma. Traumatology, 28(1), 74–83.

Mishra, R. K. (2013). Postcolonial feminism: Looking into within-beyond-to difference. International Journal of English and Literature, 4(4), 129–134.

Morse, J. M., Bowers, B. J., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A. E., Corbin, J., Porr, C. J., & Stern, P. N. (2021). Developing Grounded Theory (J. M. Morse, B. J. Bowers, K. Charmaz, A. E. Clarke, J. Corbin, C. J. Porr, & P. N. Stern, Eds.). Routledge.

Munene, I. I., & Wambiya, P. (2019). Bridging the Gender Gap through Gender Difference: Aiding Patriarchy in South Sudan Education Reconstruction. Africa Education Review, 16(5), 86–101.

Noble, H., & Mitchell, G. (2016). What is grounded theory? Evidence Based Nursing, 19(2), 34–35.

Owino, H., Awuor, B. J., Jacob Francis, P. E., Karagwa, R., Mayende, E., Khalif, M., Cirino, N., Momanyi, S., Owino, K. A., Ngigi, W. W., & Barasa, N. (2022). Amplifying the experiences of young feminists conducting advocacy in Africa in the Challenging Patriarchy Programme: The case of South Sudan, Somalia, Uganda and Kenya . Agenda, 36(3), 145–155.

Parashar, S. (2016). Feminism and Postcolonialism: (En)gendering Encounters. In Postcolonial Studies (Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 371–377). Routledge.

Piedalue, A., & Rishi, S. (2017). Unsettling the South through Postcolonial Feminist Theory. Feminist Studies, 43(3), 548–570.

Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2020). The Role of Theory in Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Research in Health Care (pp. 15–26). Wiley.

Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher–researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11(1), 30996.

Ramalho, R., Adams, P., Huggard, P., & Hoare, K. (2015). Literature review and constructivist grounded theory methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3).

Robinson, J., Barron, A., & Pottinger, L. (2021). Open Interviews. Methods for Change: Impactful Social Science Methodologies for 21st Century Problems, 1.

Ronkainen, N. J., & Wiltshire, G. (2021). Rethinking validity in qualitative sport and exercise psychology research: a realist perspective. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(1), 13–28.

Rowlands, T., Waddell, N., & McKenna, B. (2016). Are We There Yet? A Technique to Determine Theoretical Saturation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(1), 40–47.

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.

Schippert, A. C., Grov, E. K., Dahl-Michelsen, T., Silvola, J., Sparboe-Nilsen, B., Danielsen, S. O., Aaland, M., & Bjørnnes, A. K. (2021). Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: Protocol for a multistage qualitative study. BMJ Open, 11(11).

Turner, C., & Astin, F. (2021). Grounded theory: what makes a grounded theory study? European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(3), 285–289.

Ünlu, Z., & Qureshi, H. (2023). Theoretical Saturation in Grounded Theory Studies: An Evaluative Tool. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 139–162.

Urquhart, C. (2023). Grounded theory for qualitative research : a practical guide (2nd ed.). SAGE.

van der Merwe, A., & Hunt, X. (2019). Secondary trauma among trauma researchers: Lessons from the field. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(1), 10–18.

Vanner, C. (2015). Positionality at the Center. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4).

Weed, M. (2017). Capturing the essence of grounded theory: the importance of understanding commonalities and variants. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(1), 149–156.

Wiederhold, A. (2015). Conducting fieldwork at and away from home: shifting researcher positionality with mobile interviewing methods. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 600–615.