Artificial Intelligence in Psychological Qualitative Data Analysis: Is It a Balance Between Efficiency and Originality?

Chigevenga  Rosemary

doi:10.47540/ijqr.v5i2.2196

Authors

Chigevenga Rosemary Centre for Psychological Research, Oxford Brookes, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v5i2.2196

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Data Analysis, Human Originality, Efficiency, Qualitative Psychological Research

Abstract

Technological advancements have ushered in significant changes in the way activities are carried out across the world, including within the research domain. Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being applied to support a range of research tasks, such as data analysis. This has received both enthusiasm and skepticism. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the benefits and drawbacks of using AI tools in analysing psychological qualitative data to establish if there is a balance between efficiency and human originality. Eight studies formed the sample, as there is limited research that utilised AI tools in analysing qualitative psychological data. Findings show that AI tools have the potential to make data analysis accurate, efficient, and scalable, improving behaviour prediction and giving nuanced and objective analysis. On the other hand, it was noted that these tools may perpetuate inherent biases, raise some ethical concerns, lack transparency, and may generate misinformation. To create a balance between efficiency and human originality, cognisance must be given to the fact that these tools must not come as a substitute for traditional qualitative analysis of psychological data, but must be used in a hybrid form of approach. Of importance, training data for these tools should always be updated to avoid bias and possible violation of human rights.

References

Acheampong, F. A., Nunoo-Mensah, H. & Chen, W. (2021). Transformer models for text-based emotion detection: a review of BERT-based approaches. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 5789–5829.

Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138-52160.

Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. (J. Seaman, Ed.). SAGE Publications.

Benbya, H., Davenport, T. H., & Pachidi, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in organizations: Current state and future opportunities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(4).

Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2018). Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 587-604.

Bennis, I., & Mouwafaq, S. (2025). Advancing AI-driven thematic analysis in qualitative research: a comparative study of nine generative models on Cutaneous Leishmaniasis data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 25(1), 124.

Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K. W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. (1978 The Qualitative Report 2023 ed.). NeurIPS Proceedings.

Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. Machine Learning Researcher.

Buruk, O. O. (2023). Academic writing with GPT-3.5: Reflections on practices, efficacy and transparency. Cornell University.

Chen, D., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The revolution of generative artificial intelligence in psychology: The interweaving of behavior, consciousness, and ethics. Acta Psychol (Amst), 251, 104593.

Chetwynd, E. (2024). Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Writing: Current Trends. J Hum Lact, 40(2), 211-215.

Christou, P. (2023a). A Critical Perspective Over Whether and How to Acknowledge the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Studies. The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 1981-1991.

Christou, P. (2023b). The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Research for Theory Development. The Qualitative Report, 28(9), 2739-2755.

Christou, P. (2023c). How to Use Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Resource, Methodological and Analysis Tool in Qualitative Research? The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 1968-1980.

Clark, J., Barton, B., Albarqouni, L., Byambasuren, O., Jowsey, T., Keogh, J., Liang, T., Moro, C., O’Neill, H., & Jones, M. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence use in evidence synthesis: A systematic review. Research Synthesis Methods, 1-19.

Cochrane. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods in evidence synthesis: Learning Live webinar series. Cochrane.

Dave, R., Sargeant, K., Vanamala, M., & Seliya, N. (2022). Review on Psychology Research Based on Artificial Intelligence Methodologies. Journal of Computer and Communications, 10(05), 113-130.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D.,…Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Sharma, A., Rana, N. P., Giannakis, M., Goel, P., & Dutot, V. (2023). Evolution of artificial intelligence research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research topics, trends, and future directions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 192, 1-17.

Firmin, R. L., Bonfils, K. A., Luther, L., Minor, K. S., & Salyers, M. P. (2017). Using text-analysis computer software and thematic analysis on the same qualitative data: A case example. Qualitative Psychology, 4(3), 201-210.

Gibson, A. F., & Beattie, A. (2024). More or less than human? Evaluating the role of AI-as-participant in online qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 21(2), 175-199.

Grimmer, J., Roberts, M. E., & Stewart, B. M. (2021). Machine learning for social science: An agnostic approach. Annual Review of Political Science, 24, 395-419.

Haman, M., & Skolnik, M. (2024). Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review. Account Res, 31(8), 1244-1246.

Hitch, D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Augmented Qualitative Analysis: The Way of the Future? Qual Health Res, 34(7), 595-606.

Kariyapperuma, K. R. S. N., Banujan, K., Wijeratna, P. M. A. K., & Kumara, B. T. G. S. (2022). Classification of Covid19 Vaccine-Related Tweets Using Deep Learning.2022 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI).

Lee, I. (2022, 27 September). Perceiving the danger of “fake news” via machine learning and deep learning: GPT-2 and Auto ML. Proceedings of International Conference on Communication and Computational Technologies: ICCCT 2022, Singapore.

Liu, H., Ning, R., Teng. Z., Liu. J., Zhou, Q., & Zhang,Y. (2023). Evaluating the logical reasoning ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4. Cornell University.

Morgan, D. L. (2023). Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22.

Mucci, T. (2024, 21 October). The History of AI. Blog Writer. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/history-of-artificial

Nowak, M. (2025). How AI Enhances Business Process Efficiency Through Data Analysis? Retrieved 25 April 2025 from https://vmsoftwarehouse.com/data-analysis-and-risk-assessment-in-ai-project

Ocana Flores, H. I., & Luna, A. (2024). AI for Psychological Profiles: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(3), 10592-10609.

Paramasivam, A., & Nirmala, S. J. (2022). Exploring question generation in medical intelligent system using entailment. International Journal of Computers and Applications 45(3), 248–253.

Qasem, F. (2023). ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: future fears and reassurances. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 30-32.

Qiu, R. (2023). GPT revolutionizing AI applications: Empowering future digital transformation. Digital Transformation and Society, 2(2), 101-103.

Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. OpenAI. https://gluebenchmark.com/leaderboard

Salah, M., Al Halbusi, H., & Abdelfattah, F. (2023). May the force of text data analysis be with you: Unleashing the power of generative AI for social psychology research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2).

Salah, M., Alhalbusi, H., Ismail, M. M., & & Abdelfattah, F. (2024). Chatting with ChatGPT: Decoding the mind of Chatbot users and unveiling the intricate connections between user perception, trust and stereotype perception on self-esteem and psychological well-being. Current Psychology, 43, 7843–7858.

Saliba, T., & Boitsios, G. (2023). ChatGPT, a radiologist’s perspective. Pediatric Radiology, 53(5), 813-815.

Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI: Communications of the 1980. The Qualitative Report 2023 ACM, 63(5), 54-63.

Sousa, S., & Kern, R. (2023). How to keep text private? A systematic review of deep learning methods for privacy-preserving natural language processing. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(2), 1427-1492.

Watson, C., Cooper, N., Palacio, D. N., Moran, K., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2022). A systematic literature review on the use of deep learning in software engineering research. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 31(2), 58.

Williams, R. T. (2024). Paradigm shifts: exploring AI's influence on qualitative inquiry and analysis. Front Res Metr Anal, 9, 1331589.

Zhang, H., Wu, C., Xie, J., Lyu, Y., Cai, J., & Carroll, J. M. (2025). Harnessing the power of AI in qualitative research: Exploring, using and redesigning ChatGPT. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 4.

Zheng, H., & Zhan, H. (2023). ChatGPT in Scientific Writing: A Cautionary Tale. Am J Med, 136(8), 725-726 e726.

Zhou, P. (2023). Unleasing ChatGPT on the metaverse: Savior or destroyer? Cornell University.