The Multilevel Engagement Theory

Authors

  • Muhammad Hassan Raza Department of Childhood Education and Family Studies, Missouri State University, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v2i3.772

Keywords:

Culture and Diversity, Family Relationships and Functioning, Multilevel Influences, Sociocultural and Historical Times, The Multilevel Engagement Theory

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the multilevel engagement theory to conduct research studies and explain real-life situations. The multilevel engagement theory considers culture and diversity as central aspects along with the multilevel influences and sociocultural and historical contexts for understanding complex relationships and functioning among individuals, groups, and families in societies around the world. A critical review and assessment of the contemporary theories were conducted which uncovered important gaps and helped the author to demonstrate the contribution of the multilevel engagement theory in the relevant fields of study. Then, the author discussed the principles, assumptions, concepts, and propositions of the multilevel engagement theory. The use, application, and operationalization of the multilevel engagement theory in empirical research were also described with specific examples. The author also provided specific and testable hypotheses and qualitative themes for additional clarity and explanation of the multilevel engagement theory. The multilevel engagement theory offers researchers a comprehensive theoretical framework and a unique lens for studying family relationships and functioning in contextualized and inclusive manners. The implications and limitations are discussed.

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709-716.

Andersen, M. L., & Collins, P. H. (2019). Race, class, and gender: Intersections and inequalities (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1986a). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bharat, C., Larney, S., Barbieri, S., Dobbins, T., Jones, N. R., Hickman, M., Gisev, N., Ali, R., & Degenhardt, L. (2021). The effect of person, treatment, and prescriber characteristics on retention in opioid agonist treatment: A 15‐year retrospective cohort study. Addiction, 116 (11), 3139–3152.

Bowlby, J. (1960). Grief and mourning in infancy and early childhood. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 15, 9-52.

Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350-373.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115– 125.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.

Duvall, E. M., & R. L. Hill (1948). Reports of the committee on the dynamics of family interaction. National Conference on Family Life. Washington, DC.

Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd Ed.). New York Norton.

Few-Demo, A. L., & Allen, K. R. (2020). Gender, feminist, and intersectional perspectives on families: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82, 326-345.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

Goldenberg, I., Stanton, M., & Goldenberg, H. (2017). Family theraphy: An overview (9th ed.). Cengage.

Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2014). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Hill, R. (1949). Families under stress. Harper and Row Publishers.

Hobbes, T. (1947). Leviathan. Macmillan.

LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–166). Plenum Press.

Mendenhall, T., Plowman, E., & Trump, L. (2019). Intimate relationships: Where have we been? where are we going? (3rd ed.). Kendall Hunt Publishing.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaäna, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Olson, D. H., Defrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2021). Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity, and strengths (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Parsons, T., & Bales, R. (1955). Family socialization and interaction process. The Free Press.

Pickard, K. E., & Ingersoll, B. R. (2017). Using the double ABCX Model to integrate services for families of children with ASD. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 810–823.

Prati, G., & Zani, B. (2016). A moderated multilevel study of work-to-family conflict, empowerment, and turnover intentions. Quality & Quantity, 50, 2279-2292.

Raza (2022). A global framework: Step-by-step guidelines to apply the multilevel community engagement model to effectively work with culturally diverse communities around the world. Community Psychology in Global perspective, 8 (1), 20-40.

Raza, M. H. (2018a). Work-family dynamics among working mothers in the United States. In dissertation abstracts international section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 78 (10), 1-264.

Raza, H. (2018b). Participatory action research: Working beyond disaster towards prevention. Natural Hazards, 90 (1), 1-15.

Raza, H., van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Grzywacz, J., Linver, M., & Soyoung, L. (2018c). A longitudinal examination of the work-family conflict among working mothers in the United States. Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research, 13, 107-129.

Raza, H., Grzywacz, J. G., Linver, M., van Eeden-Moorefield, B., & Lee, S. (2021). A longitudinal examination of work–family balance among working mothers in the United States: Testing bioecological theory. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 42(4), 601–615.

Raza, H. (2021). Social justice and community development: A multilevel community engagement model to effectively working with families living in culturally-diverse communities in Pakistan. ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement, 5 (1), 25-48.

Raza, H. (2020, September 24). 3rd International online seminar [Webinar]. ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement.

Raza, H. (2017). Using a mixed method approach to discuss the intersectionalities of class, education, and gender in natural disasters for rural vulnerable communities in Pakistan. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 12 (1), 128-148.

Raza, H. (2021). Social justice and community development: A multilevel community engagement model to effectively work with families living in culturally-diverse communities in Pakistan. ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement, 5 (1), 25-48.

Raza, H., Sheraz, A., & Zafar, R. (2012). Effect of Islamic perception on family planning practices. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 5, 85-96.

Raza, H., van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Lee, S. & Lieberman, L. (2019), Contextual Influences on contraception use among poor women in Pakistan. Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research, 14, 53-77.

Raza, H., Grzywacz, J. G., Linver, M., van Eeden-Moorefield, B., & Lee, S. (2021). A longitudinal examination of work–family balance among working mothers in the United States: Testing bioecological theory. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 42(4), 601–615.

Raza, H., Grzywacz, J. G., van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Linver, M., & Lee, S. (2023). A content analysis of work-family conflict scholarship in the United States, 2010-2018. Family Science Review, 27(1), 1-23.

Raza, H., Baron Cortes, L. M., van Eeden-Moorefield, B., & Khaw, L. (2023). Using mixed models to examine the factors associated with intimate partner violence among married women in Pakistan. Aggressive Behavior, 49(3), 1-12,

Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2022). Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Smith, S. R., & Hamon, R. R. (2017). Exploring family theories (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Smith, S. R., & Hamon, R. R. (2022). Exploring family theories (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Samek, D. R., Rueter, M. A., Keyes, M. A., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2015). Parent involvement, sibling companionship, and adolescent substance use: A longitudinal, genetically informed design. Journal of Family Psychology, 29 (4), 614–623.

Suggett, R., Radtke, D., & Paul, K. (2017). Person to person: Positive relationships don’t just happy (6th ed.). Person Education.

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H.1(959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151.

White, J. M., Klein, D., & Adamsons, K. (2019). Family theories: An introduction newbury (5th ed.). Sage Publishing.

Published

2023-03-25

How to Cite

Raza, M. H. (2023). The Multilevel Engagement Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(3), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v2i3.772

Issue

Section

Articles