Analysis of the Conceptual Basis Differences in Gramsci's Perspective: A Case Study of the Kokoda and Ayamaru Tribes
Keywords:
Ayamaru Tribe, Conceptual Basis Differences, Gramsci Perspective, Kokoda TribeAbstract
The Kokoda and Ayamaru tribes in Sorong City are both Indigenous Papuans (OAP), yet they possess very different and unique characteristics, values, and daily life patterns. This research aims to analyze the differences in the conceptual basis between the Ayamaru and Kokoda tribes using Gramsci's perspective. The study employs a case study approach through participatory observation and in-depth interviews. The collected data were classified and then analyzed using Gramsci's perspective. The informants included community leaders, traditional leaders, and members of the community with a deep understanding of the culture and identity of the Kokoda and Ayamaru tribes. The research findings reveal several conceptual basis differences between the Kokoda tribe, as a dominant tribe, and the Ayamaru tribe, as a dominant tribe. These differences include: Values of Solidarity, Educational Values, Religious Differences, Cultural and Geographic Differences, and Label/Stereotype Differences
References
Adam, R. (2021). Antara Protestantisme dan Kapitalisme: Membaca Ulang Weber. The Center for Religious anLHd Cross-cultural Studies (CRCS) at the Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Ahriani, A., Agustang, A. Syukur, M., Upe, A. (2023). The Vicious Circle of Marginalization of the Kokoda Tribe in Sorong, Southwest Papua. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 17 (4), e03380-e03380.
Ampuza, C. (2020). The most marginalized people in Uganda? Alternative realities of Batwa at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. World Development Perspectives, Vol. 20, 2020.
Asyhar-Afwan. (2015). Mutiara Terpendam Papua “Potensi Kearifan Lokal Untuk Perdamaian di Tanah Papua”. CRCS. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Aziz, S. (2020). Religious Marginalization: A Comparative Analysis Of Bhagat's The Three Mistakes Of My Life And Javed's Ashes, Wine And Dust. Hamdard Islamicus, 43 (2).
Baah FO, Teitelman AM, Riegel B. (2019). Marginalization: Conceptualizing patient vulnerabilities in the framework of social determinants of health-An integrative review. Nurs Inq., 26(1), e12268.
Benner & Wang. (2014). Demographic Marginalization, Social Integration, and Adolescents’ Educational Success. Springer Science Business Media New York, (43), 1611-1627.
Berry. W. John. (2006). Immigrant Youth: Acculturation, Identity, and Adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 2006, 55 (3), 303–332.
Brady, B. (2020). Promoting civic and political engagement among marginalized urban youth in three cities: Strategies and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, (116), 2020.
Flynn, S. (2019). Revisiting hegemony: A Gramscian analysis for contemporary social work. Irish Journal of Sociology, 0-20.
Gilmour, S. (2020). Progress Towards Health for All: Time to End Discrimination and Marginalization. Internal Journal of Environment Research and Public Health.
Gramsci, A. (1987). Prison Notebooks Catatan-Catatan Dari penjara. Diterjemahkan dari Selection From the Prison Notebooks oleh Teguh Wahyu Utomo. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Gramsci, A. (1987). Sejarah dan Budaya. Diterjemahkan dari Buku Selection From The Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Surabaya: Pustaka Promethea.
Honig, L. (2021). What Stymies Action on Climate Change? Religious Institutions, Marginalization, and Efficacy in Kenya. Perspectives on Politics, 21 (2).
Killian, B. (2020). Women's marginalization in participatory forest management: Impacts of responsibilization in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, (118), 20.
Malak, S. (2014). Transformasi Kepemimpinan di Papua. Bandung: Bina Profesi Mandiri.
Mashad, D. (2020). Muslim Papua: Membangun Harmoni Berdasar Sejarah Agama di Bumi Cendrawasih. Pusaka Al-Kautsar: Jakarta.
Matengu, M. (2018). Keeping the national standard? Contextual dilemmas of educational marginalization in Namibia. International Journal of Educational Development, (62).
Patria, N., & Arief, A. (2016). Antonio Gramsci Negara & Hegemoni. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.
Racine, L. (2020). Racialization in nursing: Rediscovering Antonio Gramsci’s concepts of hegemony and subalternity. Nursing Inquiry. (28), e12398.
Ramada. R. M. (2019). Stereotip Masyarakat Transmigran Jawa Kepada Masyarakat Suku Kokoda. (Studi Kasus di Jalur III, Kelurahan Makbusun, Kabupaten Sorong, Papua Barat 2016-2018). Skripsi.
Romdiati. H. (2019). Orang Asli papua “Kondisi Sosial Demografi dan perubahannya”. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia: LIPI.
Rubawati, E. (2019). Suku Minoritas Papua Dan Identitas Agama (Studi Etnografi Komunikasi Pada Suku Kokoda di Maibo, Kabupaten Sorong – Papua Barat). Tesis 220
Salehuddin. (2023). Inklusi Pendidikan Dan Dinamika Kebudayaan Lokal di Papua. Edu Sociata : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi, 6(2).
Salem Sara. (2020). Gramsci in the Postcolony: Hegemony and Anticolonialism in Nasserist Egypt. Theory, Culture & Society 0(0) 1–21.
Sharma. J. Anupan & Malavika Ambale. (2020). Psychological responses to reservation-based discrimination: A qualitative study of socially marginalized youth at a premier Indian university. International Journal of Educational Development, (79).
Sinaga. (2013). Masa Kuasa Belanda di Papua 1898-1962. Komunitas Bambu: Depok.
Straus. S. R. & Pollack. A. H. (2003). Social Marginalization of Overweight Children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 157, 746-752.
Suryawan, I. N. (2017). Papua Versus Papua Perubahan dan perpecahan Budaya. Labirin: Yogyakarta.
Wahid. B. (2021). Pendampingan Sosial Masyarakat Kokoda Tentang Makna “Torang Basodara” Antar Etnis Di Kota Sorong Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Multikulturalisme. Abdimas Papua Journal of Community Service, 1(1), 15.
Way. M. Maria, Basri, La. (2023). Stratifikasi Sosial Pada Suku Ayamaru di Distrik Aitinyo Tengah. Papua Jurnal of Sociology, 1 (1), 11-22.
Yoo, C. (2021). Acculturation strategies of multi-cultural family adolescents in South Korea: Marginalization, separation, assimilation, and integration. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, (81), 9–19.