The GPS for thinking: How AI partners are reshaping student metacognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v6i2.2774Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Offloading, GPS metaphor, Metacognition, Self-Regulated LearningAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming a cognitive partner in education, capable of planning tasks, monitoring progress, and evaluating solutions on a learner’s behalf. This conceptual synthesis paper examines the risk that such AI tools, while improving immediate performance, may erode students’ metacognitive abilities in their capacity to plan, monitor, and evaluate their own thinking. Drawing a parallel with GPS navigation research, where habitual turn-by- turn guidance has been shown to impair spatial memory and hippocampal engagement, we introduce the metaphor of AI as a “GPS for thinking". Through an integrative review of literature spanning cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and the learning sciences, we synthesize evidence that AI-assisted learning can lead to a form of cognitive disuse atrophy, specifically by short-circuiting the metacognitive loop. Emerging studies reveal that students who rely heavily on AI tutors often perform worse when the tool is removed, suffer from an illusion of explanatory depth, and struggle to articulate the reasoning behind their answers. To counter these effects, we propose a shift from a GPS model where the tool issues commands to a compass model, where the tool provides orientation while preserving learner agency. Five evidence-informed design principles are advanced: prompting planning before assistance, delaying and fading feedback, embedding mandatory reflection pauses, making AI reasoning visible, and calibrating learners’ confidence. The article argues that the long-term goal of educational AI must be to strengthen, not supplant, the student’s inner compass.
References
Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147179.
Azevedo, R., & Gaševic, D. (2019). Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 207210.
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics—proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26), e2422633122.
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 5664). Worth Publishers.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245281.
Chen, P., & Chavez, O. (2022). Metacognitive scaffolding in intelligent tutoring systems: A meta analysis. Computers & Education, 185, 104529.
Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 161238). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dahmani, L., & Bohbot, V. D. (2017). Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self guided navigation. Scientific Reports, 7, 41128.
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271280.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717741.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906911.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 4556.
Gramann, K., Hoepner, P., & Karrer Gauss, K. (2017). Modified navigation instructions for spatial navigation assistance systems lead to incidental spatial learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 193.
Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 101121.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co designing a real time classroom orchestration tool for teacher AI collaboration. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(3), 350385.
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018. Education for Information, 34(4), 285291.
Ishikawa, T., Fujiwara, H., Imai, O., & Okabe, A. (2008). Wayfinding with a GPS based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 7482.
Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Maguire, E. A., Woollett, K., & Spiers, H. J. (2006). London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus, 16(12), 10911101.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Molenaar, I. (2022). The concept of hybrid human AI regulation: Exemplifying how to support young learners’ self regulated learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100057.
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal.
OECD. (2021). AI in education: Promises and pitfalls. OECD Publishing.
Pozuelos, J. P., & Moreno, R. (2021). Neural correlates of metacognitive monitoring: A meta analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2), 89101.
Prather, J., Reeves, B. N., Denny, P., Becker, B. A., Leinonen, J., Luxton Reilly, A., Powell, G., Finnie Ansley, J., & Savelka, J. (2024). The robots are coming: On the potential of ChatGPT for computing education. In Proceedings of the 2024 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference (ITiCSE 2024) (Vol. 1, pp. 112118). ACM.
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1522.
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676688.
Roelle, J., Schmidt, E. M., Buchau, A., & Berthold, K. (2017). Effects of informing learners about the dangers of cognitive offloading on their offloading behavior and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 971987.
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582599.
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521562.
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2017). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. In The psychology of learning and motivation, (67), 145. Academic Press.
Schrader, C. (2020). How to support metacognition in digital learning environments: A review of recent advances. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(5), 9871012.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460475.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351371.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333339.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45.
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356367.
Tyndall, J. (2010). AACODS checklist for appraising grey literature. Flinders University.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197221.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 314.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546553.
Wiley, J., & Jensen, J. (2020). The illusion of explanatory depth in digital learning: Why students overestimate their understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 721744.
Wise, A. F., & Hsiao, Y. T. (2019). Self regulation in online discussions: Aligning data streams to model and support normative behaviors. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19) (pp. 220229). ACM.
Zheng, L., Li, X., & Chen, F. (2019). Effects of metacognitive prompts on learning outcomes in e learning environments: A meta analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 179191.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2018). Developing self regulating learners: The role of feedback and self reflection. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 153168.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sayed Mahbub Hasan Amiri, Naznin Akter, Marzana Mithila, Md. Mainul Islam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
