Determining the Usefulness of Land Information Management System (LIMS) in Ending Land Disputes in Zimbabwean A1 Farms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47540/ijcs.v3i2.1606Keywords:
Land Dispute, Land Information Management System, Land Use PlanningAbstract
This study sought to determine the usefulness of the Land Information Management System (LIMS) for the resolution of Land Disputes in Marondera District A1 resettlement areas. The research was inspired by the continued occurrence of land disputes in Marondera A1 Farms. The main thrust of the research was to determine to assess the usefulness of the LIMS model in ending land disputes in Marondera District A1 farms. The study adopted a mixed research approach hinged on pragmatism research philosophy. A cross-sectional survey research design was used. The research used stratified random sampling for quantitative data whilst purposive sampling was used for the collection of qualitative data. Structured questionnaires and interview guides were the two major instruments that were used. A sample size of 373 participants was drawn from the Department of Lands Marondera, the Zimbabwe Lands Commission, Extension officers, and A1 farmers in areas of Wenimbi, Mushandira, and Ruware in Marondera. The sample size was arrived at using the Raosoft sample size calculator. The sample size for qualitative data was not predetermined but was arrived at using the saturation principle. In the analysis of quantitative data, tables, descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics were produced using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. The presentation of qualitative data followed a thematic approach in which responses were shown using word cloud analysis. The study revealed that the improved LIMS will enable land registration, land use planning, land dispute resolution, and data analysis and reporting. It was recommended in the study that the government encourage open communication and collaboration among local communities, farmers, and authorities to address grievances and prevent conflicts, fostering a sense of shared responsibility and ownership. Also with LIMS government conducts a thorough audit to identify and resolve issues related to land ownership, boundaries, and usage, helping to prevent future disputes.
References
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950.
Ampofo, J. A., Owusu, E. S., & Adongo, R. (2024). Human Settlement in High-Risk Floodplains in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. ADRRI Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 21(2 (9), January 2024-March, 2024), 1-15.
Anstey, S., & Sousa, C. D. (2001). Old ways & new challenges: traditional resource management systems in the Chimanimani mountains, Mozambique. African wildlife and livelihoods: the promise and performance of community conservation, 195-207.
Appiah, D. O., Schröder, D., Forkuo, E. K., & Bugri, J. T. (2015). Application of geo-information techniques in land use and land cover change analysis in a peri-urban district of Ghana. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(3), 1265-1289.
B. Rawat, D., Chaudhary, V., & Doku, R. (2020). Blockchain technology: Emerging applications and use cases for secure and trustworthy smart systems. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 1(1), 4-18.
Balas, M., Carrilho, J., & Lemmen, C. (2021). The Fit for Purpose Land Administration approach-connecting people, processes and technology in Mozambique. Land, 10(8), 818.
Baumann, A., Alexander, S., & Burdon, P. (2020). Land commodification as a barrier to political and economic agency: a degrowth perspective. Journal of Australian Political Economy, The, (86), 379-405.
Biitir, S. B., Nara, B. B., & Ameyaw, S. (2017). Integrating decentralised land administration systems with traditional land governance institutions in Ghana: Policy and praxis. Land use policy, 68, 402-414.
Buba, F. N., Ojinnaka, O. C., Ndukwu, R. I., Agbaje, G. I., & Orofin, Z. O. (2021). Assessment of flood vulnerability in some communities in Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria, using participatory geographic information systems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55, 102111.
Chambati, W., & Mazwi, F. (2022). “The Land Belongs to Us”: Ethnic Claims Over Land During Zimbabwe’s Land Reforms. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 11(1), 85-111.
Chirisa, I., & Nel, V. (2023). Conflicts, Confrontations and Conduits in Rural Environments: Is Resilience at Work in Gokwe South Rural District?. International Journal of Rural Management, 19(1), 149-164.
Chiweshe, M. K., Chakona, L., & Helliker, K. (2015). Patriarchy, women, land and livelihoods on A1 farms in Zimbabwe. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 50(6), 716-731.
Coronado, S. (2019). Rights in the time of populism: land and institutional change amid the reemergence of right-wing authoritarianism in Colombia. Land, 8(8), 119.
Dadashpoor, H., & Ahani, S. (2019). Land tenure-related conflicts in peri-urban areas: A review. Land Use Policy, 85, 218-229.
De Juan, A. (2017). “Traditional” resolution of land conflicts: the survival of precolonial dispute settlement in Burundi. Comparative Political Studies, 50(13), 1835-1868.
Domínguez, L., & Luoma, C. (2020). Decolonising conservation policy: How colonial land and conservation ideologies persist and perpetuate indigenous injustices at the expense of the environment. Land, 9(3), 65.
Dwyer, M. B. (2015). The formalization fix? Land titling, land concessions and the politics of spatial transparency in Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(5), 903-928.
Eria, S., & McMaster, R. B. (2017). GIS diffusion in Uganda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31(5), 884-906.
Gupta, R., Shah, M. N., & Mandal, S. N. (2023). Emerging paradigm for land records in India. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(5), 963-974.
Hulak, O., Golovko, L., & Holoviy, L. (2022). Legal liability for corruption and related offenses in the field of land relations. Law. Human. Environment, 13(1), 73-80.
Jaitner, A., Caldeira, R., & Koynova, S. (2017, March). Transparency International-Land Corruption in Africa-Finding Evidence, Triggering Change. In Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC, USA (Vol. 20).
Jaitner, A., Caldeira, R., & Koynova, S. (2017, March). Transparency International-Land Corruption in Africa-Finding Evidence, Triggering Change. In Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC, USA (Vol. 20).
Kithui, L. M. (2020). Creating a Land Information System Case Study-Kamiti/anmer Block 4, Kiambu (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Larsen, H. G., & Adu, P. (2021). The theoretical framework in phenomenological research: Development and application. Routledge.
Liu, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China. Land Use Policy, 102, 105288.
Nhodo, L., Basure, H. S., Rukuni, T., & Mago, D. (2020). Forced displacements and violence: Experiences from the Tokwe Mukosi displacement in Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Ikoro Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 14(1), 229-242.
Nhodo, L., Ojong, V. B., & Chikoto, D. (2021). Ethical and practical reflections of resident anthropologists in conflict zones: experiences from the Tokwe Mukosi Dam project and displacement at Chingwizi, Zimbabwe. The Oriental Anthropologist, 21(1), 210-220.
Solomon, A., Solomon, J., & Suto, M. (2004). Can the UK experience provide lessons for the evolution of SRI in Japan?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 552-566.
Torma, G., & Aschemann-Witzel, J. (2023). Social acceptance of dual land use approaches: Stakeholders' perceptions of the drivers and barriers confronting agrivoltaics diffusion. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 610-625.
Torma, G., & Aschemann-Witzel, J. (2023). Social acceptance of dual land use approaches: Stakeholders' perceptions of the drivers and barriers confronting agrivoltaics diffusion. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 610-625.
Tricker, R. I. (2012). The evolution of corporate governance. The SAGE handbook of corporate governance, 39-61.
Tsikata, D. A. (2015). The social relations of agrarian change. London: IIED.
Yeboah, E. R. I. C., Addda, M., & Okai, M. (2017, March). Women, Land and Corruption in Ghana: Findings from a Baseline Survey. In Proceeding from 2017 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Makomo Agnes, Masarira T.P

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.