Selection of Raw Material Suppliers For Yarn Based on Sustainable Supply Chain Management Criteria Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS Methods at PT XYZ

Authors

  • Alma Dwi Yulia Sari Department of Industrial Engineering, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Farida Pulansari Department of Industrial Engineering, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Isna Nugraha Department of Industrial Engineering, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47540/ijsei.v6i1.1802

Keywords:

Cut Off Point, FAHP, Supplier Selection, Sustainable, TOPSIS

Abstract

The industrial revolution and mass production directly increased human productivity and significantly impacted the environment. Amid these environmental problems, companies created environmentally friendly production strategies and prioritized economic factors (profit) and how they impact the social environment. This makes sustainable supply chain management in Sustainable Supplier Selection (SSS) increasingly in demand because it can affect the company's environmental performance. Companies that can improve their environmental and social performance will be able to increase their competitive advantage and impact, increasing revenue, market share, and a more positive green image of the company. There is no research on sustainable supplier selection in the sarong industry, especially in Indonesia. Therefore, research is needed on the sector because it dramatically affects environmental performance. One of the companies engaged in the sarong industry is XYZ company. This study aims to evaluate Supplier performance based on sustainable aspects (economic, environmental, social) using the cut-off point method for selecting sub-criteria, FAHP for assigning sub-criteria weights, and TOPSIS for ranking Suppliers based on predetermined sub-criteria. As a result of data processing, suppliers are ranked based on their preferences. As a result, Supplier 2 (S2) ranked first with a preference value of 0.9210, followed by Supplier 1 (S1) with a preference value of 0.7514, Supplier 3 (S3) with a preference value of 0.3166, and Supplier 4 (S4) with a preference value of 0.00019.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aciìmovic, S., Miìjuškovic, V., & Rajic, V. (2020). The iìmpact of reverse logiìstiìcs onto green supply chaiìn competiìtiìveness eviìdence from Serbiìan consumers. Iìnternatiìonal Journal of Retaiìl and Diìstriìbutiìon Management, 48(9), 1003–1021.

Arundaa, R., & Kalua, A. L. (2023). Iìmplementasiì Multiìple Attriìbute Deciìsiìon Makiìng Dalam Pemiìliìhan Diìstriìbutor Terbaiìk Menggunakan Metode TOPSIìS. Jurnal Iìlmiìah Computer Sciìence, 1(2), 77–87.

Aziìmiìfard, A., Moosaviìrad, S. H., & Ariìafar, S. (2018). Selectiìng sustaiìnable suppliìer countriìes for Iìran’s steel iìndustry at three levels by usiìng AHP and TOPSIìS methods. Resources Poliìcy, 57, 30–44.

Bera, B., Shiìt, P. K., Sengupta, N., Saha, S., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2022). Susceptiìbiìliìty of deforestatiìon hotspots iìn Teraiì-Dooars belt of Hiìmalayan Foothiìlls: A comparatiìve analysiìs of VIìKOR and TOPSIìS models. Journal of Kiìng Saud Uniìversiìty - Computer and Iìnformatiìon Sciìences, 34(10), 8794–8806.

Broto, A. B., Aziìs, D., & Maulana, M. (2020). Penerapan FAHP Pada Pemiìliìhan Metode Pelaksanan Erectiìon Box Giìrder (Vol. 19, Iìssue 1).

Çalık, A. (2021). A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIìS methodology for green suppliìer selectiìon iìn the Iìndustry 4.0 era. Soft Computiìng, 25(3), 2253–2265.

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Appliìcatiìons of the extent analysiìs method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operatiìonal Research, 95(3), 649–655.

Chen, X., Despeiìsse, M., & Johansson, B. (2020). Enviìronmental sustaiìnabiìliìty of diìgiìtaliìzatiìon iìn manufacturiìng: A reviìew. Iìn Sustaiìnabiìliìty (Swiìtzerland), 12 (24).

Dariì, W. (2024). Praktiìk Biìsniìs Berkelanjutan UMKM Rumah BUMN Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Triìple Bottom Liìne. Jurnal Atma Sosiìologiìka, 1(1), 59–86.

Do, Q. H., Tran, V. T., & Tran, T. T. (2024). Evaluatiìng lecturer performance iìn Viìetnam: An appliìcatiìon of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIìS methods. Heliìyon, 10(11).

Edeiìgba, J., & Arasanmiì, C. (2022). An empiìriìcal analysiìs of SMES’ triìple bottom liìne practiìces. Journal of Accountiìng & Organiìzatiìonal Change, 18(2), 238–259.

Elkiìngton, J. (1988). Partnershiìps from canniìbals wiìth forks: The triìple bottom liìne of 21st‐century busiìness. Enviìronmental Qualiìty Management, 8(1), 37–51.

Fallahpour, A., Udoncy Olugu, E., Nurmaya Musa, S., Yew Wong, K., & Nooriì, S. (2019). A deciìsiìon support model for sustaiìnable suppliìer selectiìon iìn sustaiìnable supply chaiìn management. Computers and Iìndustriìal Engiìneeriìng, 105, 391–410.

Grant, D. B., Trautriìms, A., & Wong, C. Y. (2023). Sustaiìnable Logiìstiìcs And Supply Chaiìn Management. Kogan Page.

Gulo, A. K., & Murniì, D. (2023). Analiìsiìs Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Cut Off Poiìnt Dan Fuzzy Siìmple Addiìtiìve Weiìghtiìng Dalam Menentukan Jeniìs Laptopterbaiìk Pada Mahasiìswa Matematiìka Fmiìpa Uniìversiìtas Negeriì Padang. Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Iìlmiìah Pendiìdiìkan Matematiìka, Matematiìka Dan Statiìstiìka, 4(3), 1577–1587.

Haleem, A., Khan, S., Luthra, S., Varshney, H., Alam, M., & Khan, M. Iì. (2021). Suppliìer evaluatiìon iìn the context of ciìrcular economy: A forward step for resiìliìent busiìness and enviìronment concern. Busiìness Strategy and the Enviìronment, 30(4), 2119–2146.

Iìriìanto, Sudarmiìn, & Adiìnsyah, G. (2022). Iìriìanto (2023). Journal of Sciìence and Sociìal Research, 4(3), 376–380.

Jiìn, W., Xu, L., Wu, S., Xu, Y., & Han, S. (2023). Green Development Poliìciìes for Chiìna’s Manufacturiìng Iìndustry: Characteriìstiìcs, Evolutiìon, and Challenges. Sustaiìnabiìliìty (Swiìtzerland), 15(13).

Josiìah, T., Riìswandiì, Iì., & Tukiìmun. (2024). Manajemen Pengadaan. Sulur Pustaka. www.sulur.co.iìd

Laurentiìa, N., & Septiìaniì, W. (2023). YBM Uniìversiìty touriìsm buiìldiìng locatiìon selectiìon wiìth a combiìnatiìon of cut off poiìnt and AHP Topsiìs method. AIìP Conference Proceediìngs.

Lestariì, A. D., Agusta, A. S., Triìaniì, G., Shahne, Iì. P., & Rosyaniì, P. (2023). OKTAL : Jurnal Iìlmu Komputer dan Sciìence Analiìsa Perbandiìngan Siìstem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksiì Peneriìma Beasiìswa Menggunakan Metode SAW, WP, dan TOPSIìS. 2(7).

Liì, Y., Diìabat, A., & Lu, C. C. (2020). Leagiìle suppliìer selectiìon iìn Chiìnese textiìle iìndustriìes: a DEMATEL approach. Annals of Operatiìons Research, 287(1), 303–322.

Mahmudiì, A. (2022). Siìstem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Tenaga Kependiìdiìkan Menggunakan Metode Promrthee. Curtiìna, 3(1), 52–61.

Mamede de Andrade, E., Rodriìgues, L. L., & Cosenza, J. P. (2020). Corporate Behaviìor: An Exploratory Study of the Braziìliìan Tax Management from a Corporate Sociìal Responsiìbiìliìty Perspectiìve. Sustaiìnabiìliìty, 12(11), 4404.

Mohammed, A., Harriìs, Iì., & Goviìndan, K. (2019). A hybriìd MCDM-FMOO approach for sustaiìnable suppliìer selectiìon and order allocatiìon. Iìnternatiìonal Journal of Productiìon Economiìcs, 217, 171–184.

Muttaqiìn, Z., Handayaniì, D., & Triìyono, G. (2024). Penerapan Metode Siìmple Addiìtiìve Weiìghtiìng (SAW) Dalam Pemiìliìhan Suppliìer Terbaiìk Pada Iìndustriì Manufaktur. Tekniìka, 13(3), 418–427.

Pedroso, B. C., Tate, W. L., Siìlva, A. L. da, & Carpiìnettiì, L. C. (2021). Suppliìer development adoptiìon: A conceptual model for triìple bottom liìne (TBL) outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Productiìon, 314, 127886.

Putriì, F. K., & Pulansariì, F. (2022). PVC Resiìn Suppliìer Selectiìon wiìth Iìntegratiìon of AHP and TOPSIìS Methods. Jurnal Manajemen Iìndustriì Dan Logiìstiìk, 6(1), 84–98.

Roziì, M. F., Santoso, E., & Furqon, M. T. (2019). Siìstem Pendukung Keputusan Peneriìmaan Pegawaiì Baru menggunakan Metode AHP dan TOPSIìS. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologiì Iìnformasiì Dan Iìlmu Komputer, 3(9), 8361–8366.

Saaty, T. L. (1988). Multiìcriìteriìa Deciìsiìon Makiìng : The Analytiìc Hiìerarchy Process. Uniìversiìty of Piìttsburgh, RWS Publiìcatiìon.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Deciìsiìon Makiìng Wiìth The Analytiìc Hiìerarchy Process. Iìnt J Serv Sciì, 1(1), 83–98.

Sariì, S., & Mubaroq, R. (2023). Evaluasiì Kriìteriìa Pemiìliìhan Suppliìer Materiìal Auxiìliìary Engiìne Shiìpyard Menggunakan Metode Cut-off poiìnt. Performa: Mediìa Iìlmiìah Tekniìk Iìndustriì, 22(1), 6.

Sen, D. K., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2019). Sustaiìnable suppliìer selectiìon iìn iìntuiìtiìoniìstiìc fuzzy enviìronment: a deciìsiìon-makiìng perspectiìve. Benchmarkiìng: An Iìnternatiìonal Journal, 25(2), 545–574.

Sharma, D., Sriìdhar, S., & Claudiìo, D. (2020). Compariìson of AHP-TOPSIìS and AHP-AHP methods iìn multiì-criìteriìa deciìsiìon-makiìng problems. Iìnternatiìonal Journal of Iìndustriìal and Systems Engiìneeriìng, 34(2), 203–223.

Siìagiìan, R. R. C., Napiìtupulu, N., Gultom, P., & Syahputra, M. R. (2023). Penerapan Metode Cut Off Poiìnt dan Fuzzy Serta Techniìque For Order Preference of Siìmiìlariìty to Iìdeal Solutiìon Pada Penentuan Smartphone Terbaiìk: Studiì Kasus Pada Mahasiìswa Matematiìka Uniìversiìtas Sumatera Utara Parapat Gultom. Iìn Journal of Mathematiìcs Educatiìon and Sciìence (Vol. 9, Iìssue 1).

Siìnaga, S., & Octo Yuneta, T. (2024). Analiìsiìs Pemiìliìhan Suppliìer Bahan Baku Alumiìniìum Pada PT XYZ Menggunakan Metode Analytiìcal iìerarchy Process. Iìndustriì Iìnovatiìf: Jurnal Tekniìk Iìndustriì, 14(2), 311–322.

Sudiìpa, Iì. G. Iì., Khariìsma, L. P. Iì., Fajriìana, Khaiìrunniìsa, Valentiìno, D., Sariì, F., Sutoyo, M., Rusliìyadiì, M., Setiìawan, Iì., Martaseliì, E., Sandhiìyasa, Iì. M., Suliìstiìanto, & Wiìnarno, E. (2023). Penerapan Deciìsiìon Support System (DSS) dalam Berbagaiì Biìdang (Revolusiì Iìndustriì 4.0 Menuju Era Sociìety 5.0). Son Mediìa Publiìsher.

Sur, U., Siìngh, P., & Meena, S. R. (2020). Landsliìde susceptiìbiìliìty assessment iìn a lesser Hiìmalayan road corriìdor (Iìndiìa) applyiìng fuzzy AHP techniìque and earth-observatiìon data. Geomatiìcs, Natural Hazards and Riìsk, 11(1), 2176–2209.

Tang, Y., Zhu, H., & Yang, J. (2022). The asymmetriìc effects of economiìc growth, urbaniìzatiìon and deiìndustriìaliìzatiìon on carbon emiìssiìons: Eviìdence from Chiìna. . Energy Rep. Journal, 8, 513–521.

Thakkar, J. J. (2021). Multiì-Criìteriìa Deciìsiìon Makiìng. Studiìes iìn Systems, Deciìsiìon and Control. https://doiì.org/doiì:10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8

Tiìrkolaee, E., Mardaniì, A., Dashtiìan, Z., Soltaniì, M., & Weber, G. W. (2020). A novel hybriìd method usiìng fuzzy deciìsiìon makiìng and multiì-objectiìve programmiìng for sustaiìnable-reliìable suppliìer selectiìon iìn two-echelon supply chaiìn desiìgn. Journal of Cleaner Productiìon, 250, 119.

Vafaeiì, N., Riìbeiìro, R. A., & Camariìnha-Matos, L. M. (2021). Assessiìng Normaliìzatiìon Techniìques for Siìmple Addiìtiìve Weiìghtiìng Method. Procediìa Computer Sciìence, 199, 1229–1236.

Wang, C. N., Yang, C. Y., & Cheng, H. C. (2019). A fuzzy multiìcriìteriìa deciìsiìon-makiìng (MCDM) model for sustaiìnable suppliìer evaluatiìon and selectiìon based on triìple bottom liìne approaches iìn the garment iìndustry. Processes, 7(7).

Wiìbowo, S., Tyas, M. A., Nada, N. Q., & Noviìta, M. (2020). Deciìsiìon Support System Museum Ambassadors Usiìng Topsiìs Method. IìOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sciì. Eng. .

Yiìldiìz Çankaya, S., & Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chaiìn management practiìces on sustaiìnabiìliìty performance. Journal of Manufacturiìng Technology Management, 30(1), 98–121.

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Yulia Sari, A. D., Pulansari, F. ., & Nugraha, I. . (2025). Selection of Raw Material Suppliers For Yarn Based on Sustainable Supply Chain Management Criteria Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS Methods at PT XYZ. Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues (IJSEI), 6(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijsei.v6i1.1802

Issue

Section

Articles